- SCCR 30 End of Session on the Broadcasters’ Treaty: Snail pace to -almost- reach consensus
- SCCR 30 Efforts to wordsmith definition fall short
- Discussion papers on definitions, objects of protection, and rights for WIPO broadcast treaty
- On day 2 at SCCR 30, Anne Leer tells delegates to make broadcasters happy, extend treaty to Internet
- Statement of India at SCCR 30 on WIPO broadcasting treaty
- SCCR 30 The European Union on the Broadcasting treaty (thumbs up) and the L&E (thumbs down)
- SCCR30 Is the (zombie) broadcasting treaty back?
- My question to WIPO, regarding the lack of balance in SCCR 30 presentations on broadcast treaty
- SCCR 30 June 29: Agenda for the week and Group Statements re Broadcasting and L&Es
- Among House Democrats supporting Fast Track, 24 of 28 received money from drug and medical device PACS
July 1, 2015 2d Morning Session
The morning started and ended with the clear impression that there was no consensus on whether definitions are needed or not regarding broadcasting organizations or broadcasting itself. Still, Romania and the Central European States and Balkans group as well as the Russian Federation were calling for text-based work and were talking about “a road map to a diplomatic conference.”
July 1, 2015 day 3
This morning, the SCCR continued with the discussion regarding two important definitions--definition of beneficiaries: who are they? How do you define a broadcaster? And also of course what is the definition of the act of broadcasting.
On day 2 at SCCR 30, Anne Leer tells delegates to make broadcasters happy, extend treaty to InternetSubmitted by Manon Ress on 30. June 2015 - 10:23
Anne Leer is the WIPO Deputy Director General for Culture and Creative Industries Sector, where she leads WIPO’s activities in the field of copyright and related rights. Not a familiar figure at WIPO, she joined the organisation in December 2014, coming from the commercial side of British Broadcasting Corporation (BBC). In addition to the BBC, she had previously worked for Paramount, Oxford University Press, and Financial Times/Pearson and Prentice Hall.
This is from the statement India read today at SCCR 30, on the topic of the broadcast treaty.
India is flexible in supporting the issue of unauthorized live transmission of signal over computer networks provided the broadcasting organization has rights over the content broadcast by it. India alternative proposals submitted at 26th session of SCCR are in complete conformity with the mandate of the 2007 WIPO General Assembly.
Not surprising: the European Union statement re the agenda:
Day 1 of SCCR 30 Information Session
Find a few Juicy bits from the long "Information Session on Broadcasting" that started this morning and was continued way passed the planned time of 4pm. It was also the least balanced panel I have ever seen at a WIPO SCCR. A handful of broadcasters, one media analyst, one journalist at the BBC, the WIPO Secretariat represented by Ann Leer (who worked for Paramount, Oxford University Press, BBC, and Financial Times/Pearson and the BBC).
Basically there was no one remotely critical of the proposed treaty nor any public interest representative.
Today we are in endless "informational" session, chaired by John Simpson from the BBC, and featuring big broadcasters from India (Zee Network), and Brazil (TV Globo), ABN Holdings Ltd (ABN) (A company headquartered England, about) and the Caribbean Communications Network Limited.
Among House Democrats supporting Fast Track, 24 of 28 received money from drug and medical device PACSSubmitted by James Love on 21. June 2015 - 8:17
I spent a bit of time to look at the contributions from selected drug and medical device Political Action Committees (PACs) to the 28 House Democrats who voted for fast track on June 18, 2015.
We just received a reply from a September 17, 2013 FOIA request KEI filed with USTR, asking for correspondence involving General Electric's efforts to block the WIPO Treaty for the Blind. USTR provided 24 pages of documents, available here:
Norway delivered the following statement on non-violation and situation complaints at the June 2015 meeting of the WTO TRIPS Council.
TRIPS COUNCIL MEETING 9 AND 10 JUNE 2015
6. NON-VIOLATION AND SITUATION COMPLAINTS
Statement by Norway
- We would like to join the overwhelming majority of members that have intervened today.
TRIPS Council June 2015: Norway provides unequivocal support of LDC Group request for extension of the transition periodSubmitted by thiru on 17. June 2015 - 9:31
On Wednesday, 10 June 2015, Norway - a high-income member of the WTO with a GDP per capita of 100,898 USD- (Source: World Bank, 2013) delivered this powerful intervention supporting the LDC Group request for an extension of the transition period for pharmaceutical products. On the LDC Group's specific request on extension until graduation, Norway said,
Following the Friday vote in the House of Representatives which effectively blocked movement (for now) on the Trade Promotion Authority, and more generally, slowed down the TransPacific Partnership (TPP) negotiations, I was contacted by Dr. Harvey Bale, the well known former Director General of the International Federation of Pharmaceutical Manufacturers & Associations (IFPMA). In an exchange on Facebook, Dr. Bale took favorable note of the outcome on fast track, and described the vote against fast track as "A very good day, Indeed." I asked Dr.
WTO TRIPS Council (June 2015): India underscores the importance of de-linkage in discussions of financing innovationSubmitted by thiru on 10. June 2015 - 15:42
In discussions at the June 2015 WTO TRIPS Council on the role of intellectual property in financing innovation, India underscored its commitment to the principle of de-linkage by stating,
Innovation should not be viewed within the narrow prism of intellectual property monopolies but framed within a holistic, knowledge ecosystem that includes open innovation, open knowledge approaches and de-linkage of R&D costs from product prices
On Tuesday, 9 June 2015, India delivered the following statement on Non-Violation and Situational Complaints (IP/C/W/385/Rev 1). Brazil introduced the paper along with 16 other WTO members including India. The 17 co-sponsors of this paper include Argentina, Plurinational State of Bolivia, Brazil, China, Colombia, Cuba, Ecuador, Egypt, India, Indonesia, Kenya, Malaysia, Pakistan, Peru, Russian Federation, Sri Lanka and Bolivarian Republic of Venezuela.
The joint submission proposes the following action item for the Nairobi Ministerial from 15 December 2015 to 18 December 2015: