Opening remarks of the World Blind Union at Marrakesh Diplomatic Conference on a WIPO Treaty for the Blind
Submitted by thiru on 18. June 2013 - 12:09Opening Remarks WIPO DIP Com 18 June 2013
By: Maryanne Diamond on behalf of the WBUThank you Mr Chairman for the opportunity to speak at this most important Diplomatic conference.
Intervention of the Holy See: WIPO Diplomatic Conference on a Treaty for the Blind
Submitted by thiru on 18. June 2013 - 11:08The Holy See delivered this statement on 18 June 2013 at the Marrakesh Diplomatic Conference on a WIPO Treaty for the Blind.
Statement by His Excellency Archbishop Silvano M. TomasiPermanent Observer of the Holy See to the UN and Other International Organizations in Geneva at World Intellectual Property Organization Diplomatic Conference to Conclude a Treaty to Facilitate Access to Published Works by Visually Impaired Persons and Persons with Print Disabilities Marrakech (Morocco)
18 June 2013
Mr. President,
SCOTUS rules in 5-3 opinion that pay-for-delay settlement agreements are not immune from antitrust scrutiny
Submitted by Krista Cox on 17. June 2013 - 10:19On Monday, 17 June 2013, the Supreme Court of the United States released its opinion in Federal Trade Comm'n v. Actavis (formerly captioned as FTC v. Watson Pharmaceuticals, Inc.). The decision, with a 5-3 split, found that pay-for-delay settlement agreements are unusual, raising concerns of anticompetitive behavior, and are not immune from antitrust scrutiny.
Ambassador Eileen Donahoe explains why United States will not vote for UN resolution on access to medicine
Submitted by thiru on 14. June 2013 - 5:01On 13 June 2013, Ambassador Eileen Donahoe delivered the following intervention on resolution L.10/Rev.1 on Access to medicines in the context of the right of everyone to the enjoyment of physical and mental health explaining why the United States called for a vote on this resolution and would abstain.
Explanation of vote, on the resolution entitled “Access to medicines in the context of the right of everyone to the enjoyment of the highest attainable standard of physical and mental health.”
Supreme Court Unanimously Finds Isolated Human DNA is Not Patentable; Allows Patentability of cDNA
Submitted by Krista Cox on 13. June 2013 - 9:26On 13 June 2013, the long awaited opinion of the Supreme Court of the United States in the case on whether human DNA is patentable was issued and, the last line of the opinion summarizes, "We merely hold that genes and the information they encode are not patent eligible under §101 simply because they have been isolated from the surrounding genetic material."
Human Rights Council: Intervention of Brazil on resolution on access to medicines in the context of the right to health
Submitted by thiru on 13. June 2013 - 8:37On Thursday, 13 June 2013, at the Twenty-third session of the Human Rights Council in Geneva, Brazil delivered the following intervention introducing draft resolution L.10/Rev.1 on Access to medicines in the context of the right of everyone to the enjoyment of physical and mental health on behalf of India, Brazil, South Africa (IBSA), Egypt, Indonesia, Senegal and Thailand and 27 original cosponsors including Gabon, on behalf of the 54 countries of the African Group.
Mr. President,
US Chamber letter to USPTO opposes fair use, expresses "concerns" about WIPO treaty for blind
Submitted by James Love on 12. June 2013 - 9:27Obama administration blocking consensus at Human Rights Council on access to medicines resolution
Submitted by thiru on 12. June 2013 - 8:08In their introduction to Realizing the Right to Health, Andrew Clapham and Mary Robinson provide the following anecdote.
The run up to the 2008 election in the United States focused at one point on the nature of health care in America. During the second presidential debate, the candidates were asked the following question: “Is health care in America a privilege, a right, or a responsibility?” Senator Obama (as he then was) replied as follows:
WTO TRIPS Council: Intervention of India on Intellectual Property, Climate Change and Development (June 2013)
Submitted by thiru on 12. June 2013 - 5:09On 27 February 2013, Ecuador submitted a paper (IP/C/W/585) to the World Trade Organization's (WTO) Council for Trade-Related Aspects of Intellectual Property Rights (TRIPS Council) titled "Contribution of Intellectual Property to Facilitating the Transfer of Environmentally Rational Technology". This subject was placed under agenda item 11 at the June TRIPS Council's meeting under the heading of "Intellectual Property, Climate Change and Development".
Four Department of State cables on Thailand, for Special 301 Review (Years 2009 to 2011)
Submitted by James Love on 11. June 2013 - 17:59The following are four US Department of State cables discussing the status of Thailand as regards the USTR Special 301 review. KEI recently received the cables from the US Department of State in response to an earlier FOIA request.
KEI comment on WTO decision to extend TRIPS deadline for LDCs to July 1, 2021
Submitted by James Love on 11. June 2013 - 7:12The WTO TRIPS Council has just approved an extension of TRIPS Obligations for Least Developed Countries until July 1, 2021, a new eight year extension. The new extension comes with some restrictions, but provides more freedom than the previous extension, which had a widely criticized and now eliminated "no rollback" clause. The decision stops well short of what the LDCs had proposed.
KEI Statement in Support of the Unlocking Technology Act (H.R. 1892)
Submitted by Krista Cox on 10. June 2013 - 11:34Statement of Knowledge Ecology International in Support of the Unlocking Technology Act (H.R. 1892)
June 9, 2013
The bipartisan Unlocking Technology Act (H.R. 1892), introduced by Representative Lofgren (D-CA) and co-sponsored by Representatives DeFazio (D-OR), Eshoo (D-CA), Holt (D-NJ), Massie (R-KY), and Polis (D-CO) takes the welcome step of scaling back the overprotection of “digital locks” and promoting consumer choice and competition.
Audiovisual Materials in the Classroom and the WIPO treaty for copyright exceptions for persons with disabilities
Submitted by KEI Staff on 8. June 2013 - 4:01
My name is Fedro De Tomassi. I am a student at St. Olaf College, class of 2014, and next week I will be a volunteer (as a guide and interpreter) at the Diplomatic Conference to Conclude a Treaty to Facilitate Access to Published Works by Visually Impaired Persons and Persons with Print Disabilities (June 17 to 28, 2013 – Marrakesh, Morocco) http://www.wipo.int/dc2013/en/
US opposes safeguards in WIPO treaty for the blind that are included in ACTA, and Beijing treaty
Submitted by James Love on 8. June 2013 - 4:01I was in Geneva today, and was told by several delegates the US is opposing this language in the negotiating text (from the Annex)
[Proposed Footnote: It is understood that Contracting Parties who are members of the World Trade Organization (WTO) acknowledge all the principles and objectives of the Agreement on Trade-Related Aspects of Intellectual Property Rights (TRIPS Agreement) and understand that nothing in this Treaty affects the provisions of the TRIPS Agreement, including, but not limited to, the provisions relating to anti-competitive practices.]
U.S. Fair Use and the Chafee Amendment: How Do They Overlap?
Submitted by Krista Cox on 4. June 2013 - 5:05The WIPO diplomatic conference to negotiate a treaty for persons who are visually impaired is slated for 17-28 June 2013 in Marrakech, Morocco. In the context of these negotiations, there have been several discussions regarding the fair use tradition in the United States and whether references to it are important to the treaty.

Recent comments
26 weeks 6 days ago
35 weeks 11 hours ago
35 weeks 12 hours ago
35 weeks 14 hours ago
36 weeks 3 days ago
36 weeks 6 days ago
38 weeks 4 days ago
38 weeks 5 days ago
38 weeks 6 days ago
45 weeks 1 day ago