- WTO TRIPS Council (February 2014) - EU intervention on the contribution of IP to facilitate the transfer of clean technologies
- WTO TRIPS Council (February 2014) - EU's intervention on Technical cooperation and capacity building
- WTO TRIPS Council (February 2014) - EU's intervention on IP and Innovation: University Technology Partnerships
- EU proposals for TTIP, TRADE IN SERVICES, INVESTMENT AND E-COMMERCE, July 2, 2013
- ITC Investigation No. 332-543, KEI written statement, February 14, 2014 hearing
- WTO TRIPS Council (February 2014) - Bangladesh's intervention on Non-Violation and Situation Complaints
- WTO TRIPS Council (February 2014) - Bangladesh's intervention on IP and Innovation: University Technology Partnerships
- WTO TRIPS Council (February 2014) - Ecuador's interventions on the contribution of IP to facilitate the transfer of green tech
- WTO TRIPS Council (February 2014) - India's intervention on Non-Violation and Situation Complaints
- WTO TRIPS Council (February 2014) - India's intervention on the contribution of IP to facilitate the transfer of green tech
The World Bank definition of "high income" has slipped, in relative terms, compared to high income countries in generalSubmitted by James Love on 28. November 2013 - 8:04
The United States has proposed that some (but no means all) IPR obligations involving medicines be modified for countries with incomes below the amount the World Bank defines as “high.” The threshold to be considered a high income country was $12,616 in per capita income for 2012, and is adjusted every year. In contrast, the US per capita income was $50,124 in 2012. (More data here)
Earlier this year, IP-Watch submitted two FOIA requests to USTR about the TPP negotiation. I am attaching two letters from USTR to IP-Watch about the FOIAs, and a file with 127 pages of emails between USTR and various industry lobbyists. (USTR provided KEI with copies of the files provdied to IP-Watch as part a separate KEI FOIA to USTR regarding communications involving the TPP).
A lot has clearly been withheld by USTR. According to USTR's June 19, 2013 letter to IP-Watch
KEI proposal for Antibiotics Innovation Funding Mechanism (AIFM), shortlisted for demonstration project by WHO's EURO regionSubmitted by James Love on 21. November 2013 - 10:29
The WHO is considering potential projects that will demonstrate the feasibility and benefits of open innovation models, delinkage of R&D costs and product prices, and innovative finance mechanisms. The process for selection began at the regional level, as each of six WHO regions was allowed to shortlist four projects that will be considered at a December 3-4, 2013 meeting of experts in Geneva, where the list will be narrowed again, and then considered by the WHO Executive Board in January 2014 and the WHO World Health Assembly in May 2014.
This note looks at the TPP, ACTA and TRIPS provisions on injunctions, and finds the TPP text unclear, as regards the possibility of exceptions to the obligation to make injunctions available in cases in of infringements. We have asked USTR and USPTO to clarify this issue.
The TRIPS text on injunctions reads as follows:
Section 2: civil and administrative procedures and remedies
Article 44 - Injunctions.
This is the short briefing note that KEI is sending to TPP negotiators, on the issue of regulatory test data, which is currently a monopoly without space for exceptions, in the TPP text:
Exceptions to rights in regulatory test data
KEI TPP Note: Damages language in IP Chapter conflicts with US copyright law, blocks Green Paper reformsSubmitted by James Love on 20. November 2013 - 12:58
Subject: TPP, damages, US copyright law
KEI TPP Note: IP Chapter language on damages conflicts with US copyright law, and blocks reforms being considered by the USPTO Green Paper
20 November 2013
The twelfth session of the WIPO's Committee on Development and Intellectual Property (CDIP) is taking place from 18 November 2013 to 21 November 2013. This Committee, squeezed into just four days of discussions, has a heavy workload.
The USPTO’s green paper on “Copyright Policy, Creativity and Innovation in the Digital Economy” surveys current copyright law and notes that there are several areas where reform may be welcome. In many of these areas, the USPTO green paper demonstrates an openness to discussion on these issues or support existing efforts and proposals. Despite this support in some areas for reform and despite the USPTO’s involvement in the Trans-Pacific Partnership (TPP) negotiating process, there are several areas where the United States’ position in the TPP could hinder such reform.
On November 13, 2013, Wikileaks obtained and published a copy of the consolidated IP negotiating chapter for the Trans-Pacific Partnership Agreement (TPP). This leak has allowed the public to learn what is in the text, including about the reported five country counterproposal to the United States' proposal on pharmaceuticals and medicines.
KEI Comments on the August 30, 2013 version of the TPP IP Chapter
For more information, contact James Love, mailto:email@example.com, mobile +1.202.361.3040.
NIH rejects March-In petition, also rejects proposed rules on pricing of and access to government funded inventionsSubmitted by James Love on 7. November 2013 - 9:42
In a decision dated November 1, 2013, and signed by NIH Director Francis Collins, the NIH has rejected the 2012 petition to the NIH to uses its powers under the Bayh-Dole Act to protect U.S. consumers from high prices and restrictive licensing of NIH funded inventions.
GE's Thaddeus Burns wrote to US Ambassador Betty King requesting US postpone Marrakesh Diplomatic ConferenceSubmitted by KEI Staff on 29. October 2013 - 3:03
Trans-Atlantic Business Council's May 16, 2013 letter to Robert Hormats opposing Marrakesh treaty for the blindSubmitted by James Love on 28. October 2013 - 16:29
|The letter opposing the treaty for the blind was signed by TABC Director General Tim Bennett|
We just ran across this mean spirited letter by the Trans-Atlantic Business Council (TABC), a group that describes itself as follows:
The October 25, 2012 NIH March-In Request for ritonavir is now more than one year old, and the NIH has not decided to grant a hearing or reject the petition.
More information about the March-In request is available here:
(revised October 25, 2013)