- USPTO publishes new estimates of "IP-Intensive" industries, spin results
- Differences between the march-in, royalty free right, and government use options
- National Association of Manufacturers told USTR the EU position on LDC extension made a mockery of international trading system
- 500+ Pages of Documents on NFL Attempts to Influence NIH Funding of Concussion Studies
- NIH Waivers for U.S. Manufacturing Requirements for Federally-Funded Drugs
- Summary of Report of United Nations Secretary-General's High-Level Panel on Access to Medicines
- KEI Statement on United Nations Secretary-General's High-Level Panel on Access to Medicines Report
- Cancer Moonshot Blue Ribbon Panel Does Not Address Pricing, Alternative Funding Models
- German Court Issues Compulsory License on HIV Drug Patent
- Commentary on Hillary Clinton's Plan to Respond to Unjustified Price Hikes for Long-Available Drugs
What type of leverage has the Obama Administration used to pressure Thailand to prevent the granting of compulsory licenses on drug patents? The US Department of Commerce has just released a FOIA request with 298 pages of documents on this topic. 136 pages of the FOIA are for a Fall 2010 masters theses by Stephanie Tranchevent Rosenberg (pages 36 to 171 of the FOIA).
4 October 2012
Agenda item 26: Report on the Work of the Standing Committee on Copyright and Related Rights (SCCR)
Statement of Knowledge Ecology International
WIPO General Assembly 2012
This morning, under agenda item 6, the WIPO General Assemblies decided to defer a decision until 2013 on the application for accreditation by Pirate Parties International. I was told that the US, Switzerland the France raised objections in the informal consultations, and that some other European countries wanted to raise objections, but found it awkward given the recent success of domestic Pirate Parties in national elections. The USA said it asked for a hold on the decision until WIPO could decide if it wanted to accept political parties as WIPO observers.
General Statement of Chile to the WIPO General Assembly 2012 (calling for WIPO to conclude a Treaty for VIPs)Submitted by thiru on 2. October 2012 - 9:44
Fernando Schmidt, Subsecretario de Relaciones Exteriores de Chile (Vice-Minister of External Relations, Chile), delivered the following general statement on 1 October 2012. Chile acknowledged that while a favorable environment in WIPO proved conducive to the successful passage of the Beijing Treaty on Audiovisual Performances, major challenges remained. Of great import was the convening of a diplomatic conference in 2013 to conclude a Treaty for the Blind which would be a milestone in the multilateral intellectual property system.
The general statement of the Development Agenda Group (DAG) was delivered by H.E. Ambassador Roberto Azevêdo (Brazil) on 1 October 2012.
On the pressing issue of a treaty for copyright exceptions for the blind, the Development Agenda Group noted that,
General Statement of India to the WIPO General Assembly 2012 (raises concerns on public health and green technology)Submitted by thiru on 2. October 2012 - 3:48
The following statement was delivered by Shri Saurabh Chandra, Secretary, Department of Industrial Policy and Promotion (DIPP), Ministry of Commerce and Industry, New Delhi on Monday, 1 October 2012 at the WIPO General Assembly.
In her statement, India stressed that intellectual property norms must not create "monopoly situations which may hinder competition and access to technology".
This is an elaboration on the 3-step test in multilateral agreements. The 1996 WCT Copyright treaty has bad language on the 3-step test, but the WCT is not now part of the TRIPS agreement, and is only subject to dispute resolution via trade agreements outside of the WTO, like the TPPA.
If the WCT is referenced under the general provisions to the TPPA, you also get the 3-step test in the TPPA, subject, however, to the agreed upon statement regarding Article 10, which is helpful.
Report of the WIPO Standing Committee on Copyright and Related Rights to the fiftieth session of the WIPO General AssemblySubmitted by thiru on 29. September 2012 - 7:40
The fiftieth Series of Meetings of the Assemblies of the Member States of the World Intellectual Property Organization (WIPO) is meeting on Geneva from 1 October 2012 to 9 October 2012. Agenda item 26 is the "Report on the Work of the Standing Committee on Copyright and Related Rights (SCCR)" which according to the provisional agenda, is scheduled for discussion on Thursday, 4 October 2012.
Today Krista and I attended a "stakeholder consultation stakeholder consultation regarding the implementation of the World Health Organization’s Pandemic Influenza Preparedness Framework." The meeting was chaired by Jonathan Margolis, the Acting Deputy Assistant Secretary for Science, Space and Health in the Department of State’s Bureau of Oceans and International Environmental and Scientific Affairs.
KEI has recently learned that 6 of 9 countries ignored a UN Special Rapporteur request to respond to the March 22, 2011 complaint regarding the TPP. We are also disappointed in the comments from the three that did respond. The UN process for dealing with such complaints is somewhat bureaucratic and secretive. Among the three countries that did respond, Australia, Chile and New Zealand, all defended the secrecy of the TPP negotiating text and asserted that the TPP would not violate the right to health.
In Washington, DC there is a large and growing influence industry. One element of this industry is the thousands of people who register as lobbyists with the Congress. Because of the way disclosure rules are written, this is only a fraction of the persons who are actually employed to influence the Congress or the Executive Branch.
In August, KEI provided comments to USTR regarding the entry of Mexico and Canada into the TPP negotiations. (http://www.keionline.org/node/1542). Today is the public hearing. Right now there are about 35 people in the audience, and a panel of 9 persons from various agencies hearing the testimonies. There are only 10 witnesses in today's hearing, and only three, KEI, PhRMA and IIPA, are speaking on IPR issues.
In April 2012, the WHO released the Report of the Consultative Expert Working Group on Research and Development: Financing and Coordination (CEWG). One of its primary recommendations called upon member states to began formal negotiations on a binding global convention on R&D.
Yesterday I wrote about the USPTO blocking KEI and many other NGOs, blogs and news organizations from their public wifi service. The USPTO says this practice has been discontinued, as of last evening (more here: http://keionline.org/node/1548) but I found the issue interesting enough to follow up a bit. What I have found is more troubling than the initial case described yesterday.