- PCB39: Eight hour drafting session charts future course for UNAIDS work program on Intellectual Property and the UN HLP
- PCB39: Statement of Knowledge Ecology International on Agenda item 6: UNAIDS synthesis report on IP
- UNAIDS PCB 39: Statement of India on the Executive Director's Report to the 39th PCB
- EB140: World Health Organization publishes annotated agenda for January 2017 Executive Board
- SCCR33: Conclusions - Protection of Broadcasting Organizations
- SCCR33: Conclusions - Artist Resale Right (droit de suite)
- SCCR33: Conclusions - Proposal for Analysis of Copyright Related to the Digital Environment
- SCCR 33, KEI's intervention on legal protection for technological protection measures
- SCCR33 - Statement by the Latin American and Caribbean Group (GRULAC) - Limitations on liability for libraries and archives
- SCCR 33: NGOs Statements on Casting treaty in Plenary November 16, 2016
WTO TRIPS Council: India raises concerns on ACTA and TPPA on discussion of "Trends in the Enforcement of IPRs"Submitted by thiru on 26. October 2011 - 5:39
On 25 October 2011, India delivered the following intervention at the WTO TRIPS Council raising concerns on ACTA and the TPPA during discussions of "Trends in the Enforcement of Intellectual Property Rights". On ACTA, India voiced concerns on the scope of ACTA's civil enforcement measures, border measures potential role in the seizure of generic medicines, third party liability, damages and also raised systemic issues such as how WTO MFN obligations would affect WTO members who are not ACTA parties,
WTO TRIPS Council: India questions the United States on eBay v. MercExchange precedent as alternative to Paragraph 6 mechanismSubmitted by thiru on 26. October 2011 - 4:21
On 25 October 2011, the WTO TRIPS Council held its annual review of the Paragraph 6 System. The following are extracts from the intervention of India. Note that under "Any alternatives to the use of Paragraph 6 System to achieve the objective of access to medicines" India asked the United States to shed light on state practice in the US following the US Supreme Court's eBay versus MercExchange ruling (http://keionline.org/content/view/174/1).
This note begins by looking at patents issued by the USPTO that specifically mention the term ritonavir in the patent claims, or mention the NIH contract that was used to fund the early development of the product. This includes 194 patents that cite ritonavir in the patent claims, and another 42 patents that cite the NIH contact that funded the early ritonavir work. We also provide quotes from an August 19, 2011 WIPO report on the patent landscape for ritonavir that found 805 patent families related to ritonavir.
TRIPS Council (24-25 Oct 2011) will discuss Para 6 implementation, Australia's tobacco plain packaging bill 2011 and enforcementSubmitted by thiru on 18. October 2011 - 11:23
The following WTO airgram WTO/AIR/3815/REV.1 contains the agenda for the upcoming WTO Council for TRIPS meeting to be held in Geneva from Monday, 24 October 2011 to Tuesday, 25 October 2011. Paragraph 3 and agenda items G, N and O will be of interest to readers of this blog. It should be noted that in the original document, the text is capitalized. Item G covers Review under Paragraph 8 of the Decision on the implementation of Paragraph 6 of the Doha Declaration on the TRIPS Agreement and Public Health.
To better understand the benefits of the Gilead/MPP licenses, I have made some calculations of the persons living with HIV that are covered in the geographic areas of the various Gilead/MPP licenses.
- TDF/FTC territories
- COBI territories
- EVG-Quad territories
The following excerpts are from an exchange of messages on ip-health about a recent recent petition regarding the patent pool that has been posted to several public health email lists. Among the leaders in the petition are apparently ITPC and the New York based I-MAK. ITPC has a long history of advocating for the interests of persons living with HIV, and I-MAK has for many years sought to overcome patent barriers for access to medicines. A copy of the petition is here http://www.petitionbuzz.com/petitions/mppunitaid.
On 4-5 October 2011, UNITAID held its third Consultative Forum giving stakeholders the opportunity to view UNITAID's achievements to date as well as provide input on UNITAID's activities moving forward. Attendees at the forum included civil society, NGOs, implementing partners, representatives from the pharmaceutical industry and private foundations, and governmental officials. Several of the presentations from the IP workshop as well as the recommendations from the IP workshop are attached below.
Today USTR was pointing to four documents to explain the U.S. decision to sign the Anti-Counterfeiting Trade Agreement. While it was not surprising that the United States signed the agreement, KEI was disappointed that the statements did not address the issue of the inconsistencies between US law and the ACTA, or make any commitments that the ACTA Committee would operate in an open, transparent and inclusive manner.
These are the USTR documents:
David Hammerstein tweets on the European Parliament hearing on the WIPO Treaty for Blind negotiationsSubmitted by James Love on 3. October 2011 - 9:59
These were copied from David Hammerstein's twitter feed, October 3, 2010.
- Treaty Visually Impaired before European Parliament at aprox. 15:30. Webstream: bit.ly/kQgrDf info: bit.ly/oDLbL0
- This is the correct link for the webstreaming of Treaty of visually impaired before the European Parliament: bit.ly/PwS9T
- Session begins in EP´s Petition Committee on Treaty for Visually Impaired. Chris Friend, World Blind Union condemns us to "book famine"
Two areas where ACTA is inconsistent with US law, injunctions and damages
KEI Policy Brief, 2011:2
30 September 2011, revised 3 October 2011
James Love and Krista Cox
As the U.S. is reportedly about to sign ACTA, we wanted to point out two important areas where ACTA is not consistent with U.S. law. These are the sections of ACTA dealing with injunctions and damages. Below we have included the text from ACTA and the WTO TRIPS agreement on these two topics.
This was read today, September 30, 2011, at the WIPO GA
Agenda Item 33 (iii), the Advisory Committee on Enforcement
This was read today, September 30, 2011, at the WIPO GA
Agenda Item 33(i) Standing Committee on the Law of Patents
KEI agrees with the perceptive and constructive comments offered by South Africa on behalf of the Africa Group, and India, on behalf of the Development Agenda Group (DAG).
Ecuador's proposal to WIPO General Assembly to convene a Diplomatic Conference on a Treaty for Persons with Reading DisabilitiesSubmitted by thiru on 30. September 2011 - 1:56
On Thursday, 29 September 2011, Ecuador made the following intervention at the WIPO General Assembly (GA) during the consideration of a Report on the Work of the Standing Committee on Copyright and Related Rights (SCCR) which called for the WIPO GA to convene a diplomatic conference in 2012 on a treaty on copyright exceptions for persons with reading disabilities provided that SCCR23 reached agreement on a negotiating text for the TVI.
Gracias señor Presidente.
KEI general statement to 49th WIPO General Assemblies on the SCCR + Semi-live blogging of SCCR discussionsSubmitted by thiru on 29. September 2011 - 4:54
This is the statement delivered by KEI at WIPO's consideration of the Report on the Work of the Standing Committee on Copyright and Related Rights (SCCR). There was no decision point on agenda item 29 which took note of the Report of the SCCR.
On Thursday, 29 September 2011, Pakistan made the following intervention on behalf of the Asian Group during WIPO's discussion of the Report of the Standing Committee on Copyright and related Rights. On the matter of exceptions and limitations, the Asian Group stated: