Dr. Elias Zerhouni defends Sanofi/Army proposed license on Zika patents, and KEI responds

On March 21, 2017, the New York Times published a letter signed by Dr. Elias Zerhouni, defending the proposed Sanofi monopoly on the US Army patents to the Zika virus. The letter is available from the NYT from the following link, and also reprinted here, followed by commentary.

https://www.nytimes.com/2017/03/21/opinion/developing-a-zika-vaccine.html

To the Editor:

Re “Trump Should Avoid a Bad Zika Deal” (Op-Ed, March 11):

Continue Reading

Uncategorized

Maryland House of Delegates passes bill on prescription drug price gouging by vote of 137 to 4

On March 20, 2017, the Maryland House of Delegates approved a prescription drug price gouging bill by a vote of 137-4. A copy of the bill, as it passed the House, is attached.

This is a March 20, 2017 Report by Erin Cox, published in the Baltimore Sun:

Maryland’s attorney general could sue drug companies for price gouging under a bill approved by the House of Delegates Monday.

Continue Reading

Uncategorized

Leaked document: March 15, 2017 Note by Switzerland on India EFTA TEPA IP Chapter

Attached is a March 15, 2017 note by Switzerland on the India EFTA TEPA IP Chapter.

The EFTA is the The European Free Trade Association. The EFTA member states are Iceland, Liechtenstein, Norway and Switzerland. The document refers to a proposed “Trade and Economic Partnership Agreement,” or TEPA, between India and the four members of the EFTA. The EFTA page on this negotiation is here.

Continue Reading

Uncategorized

Company disclosures of R&D costs on SEC filings

Today I attended a work session of the Maryland House of Delegates subcommittee on Health Facilitates and Pharmaceuticals of the Health and Government Operations Committee. I was there to testify in support of HB 666, a bill titled: Public Health – Expensive Drugs – Manufacturer Reporting and Drug Price Transparency Advisory Committee. (PDF version here).

Continue Reading

Uncategorized

All 12 Zhang/Broad Institute CRISPR patents declare US funding and rights in inventions

February 15, 2017, the USPTO ruled that 12 genome-editing CRISPR-Cas9 patents and one patent application assigned to the Broad Institute of Harvard and MIT did not interfere with a patent application from scientists at the University of California. A copy of the ruling is available here.

Following the ruling by the USPTO that the Broad Institute and the University of California both issued statements, as did several firms with an interest in the dispute.

KEI Briefing Note 2017:1. Bayh-Dole Act and difference between March-In Rights and the world wide royalty free rights in patents

Bayh-Dole Act and difference between March-In Rights and the world wide royalty free rights in patents KEI Briefing Note 2017:1 When the United States federal government funds research that results in patents, it obtains rights, either directly or through contracts,… Continue Reading

Spinraza: KEI asks DHHS Office of the Inspector General (OIG) to investigate a failure to disclose federal funding in patents

KEI has asked the DHHS Office of Inspector General (OIG) to investigate a failure to disclose federal funding of patents on nusinersen, a drug developed by Ionis Pharmaceuticals (formerly known as Isis Pharmacetuicals) with BioGen, and sold under the trade name Spinraza.

A copy of the 22 page letter to OIG is available here.

Continue Reading